Samson was given the award for hitting an unbeaten 115 off 56 balls, while Overton’s figures of 4-18 on a batting-friendly surface ensured DC were bowled out for 189. "According to me, it should have been Overton. If he didn't get the spell, CSK wouldn't have won. Because he got very important wickets. In four overs, just 18 runs, where the target was 210. I thought the point of difference was that.

"Although, if Sanju didn't get the innings, (CSK) wouldn't have scored so many runs (212 for 2). So it was very difficult (to decide). But in such a big game, where batting is easy, I think Overton should have been given (the player of the match award)," said Jaffer on ESPNCricinfo.

Overton dismantled the DC middle order, claiming the important wickets of Sameer Rizvi, David Miller, Auqib Nabi, and Tristan Stubbs. Former Australian captain Aaron Finch agreed with Jaffer’s views and lauded Overton’s ability to maintain high speeds while executing his variations – pacy deliveries mixed with hit-the-deck balls.

"Although, if Sanju didn't get the innings, (CSK) wouldn't have scored so many runs (212 for 2). So it was very difficult (to decide). But in such a big game, where batting is easy, I think Overton should have been given (the player of the match award)," said Jaffer on ESPNCricinfo.

"He just strangled them through the middle when he had that opportunity. Big wickets at big times. I think he's a seriously good cricketer. The skill set that he brings - bat, ball, field - another one of those players that you want in the game, in the contest, when it's on the line. He likes the big moments. Every time he gets an opportunity around the world, whether it's franchise (cricket) or for England, he gets the job done," added Finch.